How Often Should Cattle Be Wormed?

How Often Should Cattle Be Wormed? | Cattle Daily
Cattle Daily — Parasite Control Guide

How Often Should Cattle Be Wormed?

Updated May 2026  |  13-Minute Read  |  Veterinary-Reviewed

Quick Summary

Internal parasites are among the most economically significant yet chronically underestimated threats in cattle production — responsible for reduced growth rates, poor feed conversion, anemia, reproductive failure, and in severe cases death, all without producing the obvious visible signs that prompt urgent management action. How often cattle should be wormed is not a simple fixed-interval question — it depends on the species of parasite present, your geographic region, the age and class of cattle, seasonal parasite biology, and increasingly on the resistance status of parasites in your herd. In 2026, the rise of anthelmintic-resistant parasite populations demands a smarter, targeted approach to deworming rather than the calendar-based blanket treatments that have driven resistance for decades. This guide gives you the science, the schedules, the products, and the diagnostics to build a parasite control program that is both effective and sustainable.

1. Why Internal Parasites Cost You Money

The economic impact of internal parasites in cattle is largely invisible — which is precisely why it is so often underestimated. Unlike a sick calf with obvious clinical signs or a cow with a swollen foot, a herd carrying a moderate internal parasite burden appears normal to the untrained eye while silently losing 5–15% of its productive potential every day.

Parasites suppress cattle performance through multiple simultaneous mechanisms: they compete for absorbed nutrients, damage the gut wall and reduce digestive efficiency, cause blood loss leading to anemia, suppress immune function, and — in heavily infected animals — produce the classic bottle jaw (submandibular edema from hypoproteinemia) that signals a potentially fatal parasite burden. The financial case for an effective parasite control program is straightforward and compelling.

$1.2B+
Annual U.S. cattle industry losses attributable to internal parasites
15–30%
Reduction in average daily gain in heavily parasitized stocker calves
$40–$80
Estimated return per head from a well-timed strategic deworming in stockers
70%+
Of parasite eggs on pasture are deposited by only 20–30% of the most susceptible animals
The Subclinical Parasite Problem: Research from the University of Georgia and Texas A&M consistently shows that cattle carrying what appears to be a manageable parasite load — below the threshold for visible clinical signs — can still show 10–20% suppression in average daily gain compared to parasite-free controls. This subclinical impact is economically significant and entirely avoidable with a properly designed control program. The absence of visible bottle jaw or severe diarrhea does not mean parasites are not costing you money.

2. Key Internal Parasites in Cattle

Effective parasite management requires understanding which parasites are present, their biology, and their seasonal patterns. Different parasites require different management strategies and respond differently to available dewormers.

Ostertagia ostertagi (Brown Stomach Worm)
Significance The most economically important cattle nematode in temperate climates — the primary target of most deworming programs. Impact Damages gastric glands in the abomasum; reduces digestive protein absorption; causes chronic weight loss, diarrhea, and bottle jaw in heavy infections. Type II ostertagiasis — mass emergence of inhibited larvae in late winter — causes severe acute disease. Season Spring and fall transmission peaks in temperate zones; overwinters as inhibited larvae.
Cooperia spp. (Small Intestinal Worms)
Significance Second most important cattle nematode; often co-infects with Ostertagia. Growing resistance to macrocyclic lactones makes Cooperia increasingly significant. Impact Damages small intestinal villi; reduces nutrient absorption; causes diarrhea and production loss particularly in young cattle under 2 years old. Season Most active in warm, moist conditions; peaks in summer in southern U.S. regions.
Dictyocaulus viviparus (Lungworm)
Significance Causes bovine verminous pneumonia (hoose) — clinically distinct from BRD but can be confused with it. Impact Larvae migrate to lungs, causing coughing, labored breathing, reduced feed intake, and secondary bacterial pneumonia. Occasional outbreaks can cause significant mortality in young naïve cattle. Season Late summer to autumn; most common in first-season grazing calves and heifers.
Moniezia spp. (Tapeworms)
Significance Common, visually obvious (segments visible in feces), but generally of low clinical significance in adult cattle. More impactful in young calves. Impact Nutrient competition in the small intestine; rarely causes serious production loss in adults unless heavy burden. Producers often prioritize treatment based on visible segments — not always economically justified. Treatment Albendazole is effective; macrocyclic lactones (ivermectin, doramectin) are NOT effective against tapeworms.
Fasciola hepatica (Liver Fluke)
Significance The most economically significant trematode in cattle; confined to fluke-endemic regions (Gulf Coast, Pacific Northwest, Great Lakes areas, parts of UK and Ireland). Impact Migrating juvenile flukes cause acute liver damage; adult flukes cause chronic liver fibrosis, reduced protein metabolism, anemia, and secondary clostridial disease (Black Disease). Significantly reduces feed efficiency and production. Treatment Clorsulon (Curatrem) or closantel — NOT susceptible to macrocyclic lactones. Triclabendazole for acute (juvenile) fluke infections.
Thelazia spp. (Eyeworms) + Other Parasites
Eyeworms Thelazia organisms live in the conjunctival tissues of the eye, causing irritation and secondary pinkeye-like signs. Macrocyclic lactone pour-ons (ivermectin, doramectin) are effective. Haemonchus placei (Barber's Pole Worm) Primarily a sheep parasite but important in cattle in tropical and subtropical regions (Gulf Coast, Florida). Causes severe blood-sucking anemia; very high egg output strains resistance development.

3. How Often Should You Deworm? The Core Answer

The honest answer to "how often should cattle be wormed?" is: as often as necessary based on your specific parasite burden — and not more often. The outdated practice of deworming all cattle on a fixed calendar schedule regardless of actual parasite burden is the primary driver of anthelmintic resistance on farms worldwide.

In 2026, the evidence-based standard of care is a targeted selective treatment (TST) approach — deworming only animals that need it, at the times when treatment provides maximum benefit, with products that are confirmed effective in your herd. This approach slows resistance, reduces product costs, and maintains effective dewormers for when they are genuinely needed.

The General Guideline for Beef Cow-Calf Operations: For most temperate-region beef operations, 1–2 strategically timed dewormings per year, combined with fecal egg count monitoring to identify highly susceptible individuals, is sufficient for adequate parasite control. Blanket deworming of the entire herd 4–6 times per year — a practice still common in many operations — is rarely justified by parasite burden data and accelerates resistance development in the local parasite population.

4. Deworming Schedules by Cattle Class

Parasite susceptibility varies dramatically by animal class. Young cattle — particularly calves in their first and second grazing seasons — are far more susceptible to parasite-related production loss than adult cows, which develop significant acquired immunity through repeated natural exposure.

Cattle Class Susceptibility Level Recommended Frequency Optimal Timing Key Parasites to Target
Calves (First Grazing Season) Very High 2–3 times per year At turnout; mid-season (Aug); at housing or weaning Ostertagia, Cooperia, Dictyocaulus
Yearlings / Stockers (Second Grazing Season) High 1–2 times per year At spring turnout; at housing or pre-sale Ostertagia, Cooperia — FEC-guided
Replacement Heifers (Pre-Breeding) Moderate-High 1–2 times per year Pre-breeding (30–60 days before bull turnout); housing Ostertagia, liver fluke if endemic area
Mature Beef Cows (3+ Years) Moderate 1 time per year unless FEC indicates need Pre-calving (4–8 weeks before calving) OR early spring Ostertagia Type II inhibited larvae; liver fluke
Bulls (Breeding Season) Moderate 1 time per year Pre-breeding (30–45 days before turnout with cows) Ostertagia; any confirmed parasites on FEC
Feedlot Arrivals High (stressed, mixed origins) 1 time — at processing on arrival Day 1–3 of arrival processing All nematodes; perform FEC 21 days post-treatment to verify efficacy
Liver Fluke Endemic Region (All Ages) High in endemic areas 1–2 times per year Late fall (after fluke transmission season) + spring Fasciola hepatica — use flukicidal products

5. Fecal Egg Count Testing: The Smarter Approach

Fecal egg count (FEC) testing is the single most important diagnostic tool for modern cattle parasite management — yet it remains vastly underused in most commercial operations. FEC testing removes the guesswork from deworming decisions and is the foundation of the targeted selective treatment approach.

1

Collect Fresh Fecal Samples

Collect fresh fecal samples from a representative group of animals — minimum 10–15 individuals from the class you want to assess. Collect directly from the rectum (using a gloved hand) or immediately from freshly deposited piles. Place each sample in a labeled zip-lock bag and refrigerate immediately. Submit to your veterinarian or laboratory within 24–48 hours. Do not freeze samples as this destroys egg viability.

2

Interpret Egg Counts in Cattle Context

Cattle FEC thresholds differ from sheep. For beef cattle, counts below 200 eggs per gram (EPG) are generally considered low risk; 200–500 EPG moderate; above 500 EPG warrants treatment in susceptible classes. For calves and yearlings on highly productive pastures, treatment threshold may be lower (150+ EPG). For mature cows with acquired immunity, even moderate counts may not justify treatment without clinical signs or production impact. Discuss specific thresholds for your operation with your veterinarian.

3

Use FEC Reduction Test to Check Dewormer Efficacy

The fecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) is the gold standard for detecting anthelmintic resistance in your herd. Collect FEC samples from 15–20 animals before treatment, treat, then collect FEC from the same animals 14–21 days after treatment. A reduction of less than 95% (for benzimidazoles and levamisole) or less than 98% (for macrocyclic lactones) strongly suggests resistance to that product class in your herd's parasite population. This test should be performed at least every 3–4 years or whenever treatment appears less effective than expected.

4

Identify Your High-Shedding Individuals (FAMACHA-Equivalent)

In most herds, 20–30% of animals carry 70–80% of the parasite burden and are responsible for most of the pasture contamination. Identifying and selectively treating these "high shedders" — rather than treating the whole herd — is the most resistance-sustainable approach. High-shedding animals show higher FEC, poorer body condition, pale mucous membranes (FAMACHA scoring), lower growth rates, and sometimes diarrhea. Repeated identification of the same individuals as high shedders may indicate a genetic predisposition — grounds for culling in a breeding program.

6. Dewormer Classes and Product Guide 2026

Understanding the three main classes of cattle anthelmintics — and how resistance has developed differently to each — is essential for making informed product choices and rotating appropriately to preserve efficacy.

Benzimidazoles (Group 1 / White Drenches)
Active ingredients: Fenbendazole, Oxfendazole, Albendazole

Products: SafeGuard, Panacur, Synanthic. Broad spectrum — effective against adult and larval roundworms; albendazole adds tapeworm and some liver fluke activity. Oral drench or pellet delivery. Resistance increasingly common; efficacy best confirmed with FECRT.

Levamisole (Group 2 / Yellow Drenches)
Active ingredient: Levamisole HCl

Products: Prohibit, Levasole, Tramisol. Effective against adult roundworms; moderate activity against larvae; no tapeworm or fluke activity. Narrow safety margin — do not overdose. Less commonly used in the U.S. than in other countries; useful in rotation programs as resistance is lower than other classes.

Macrocyclic Lactones (Group 3 / Clear Drenches)
Active ingredients: Ivermectin, Doramectin, Eprinomectin, Moxidectin

Products: Ivomec, Dectomax, LongRange, Cydectin. Broad spectrum — nematodes plus mange mites, lice, and grubs. Multiple delivery forms (injectable, pour-on, oral, long-acting). Most widely used class globally. Significant resistance developing in Cooperia spp. Moxidectin (Cydectin) has longest persistent efficacy. LongRange (eprinomectin extended-release) provides 100-150 day parasite control.

Flukicides (Liver Fluke Only)
Active ingredients: Clorsulon, Closantel, Triclabendazole

Products: Curatrem (clorsulon), Closicare. Clorsulon is only effective against adult liver flukes (12+ weeks). Triclabendazole (Fasinex) targets all fluke stages including juveniles — most important in acute fluke outbreaks. Combine with a nematode treatment (e.g., Ivomec Plus = ivermectin + clorsulon) for dual coverage.

Combination Products
Multi-class combinations

Products: Ivomec Plus (ivermectin + clorsulon), Dectomax Pour-On (doramectin), Quest Plus (moxidectin + praziquantel — equine). Using true multi-class combinations in cattle (e.g., ML + benzimidazole) can improve efficacy against resistant populations but accelerates multi-class resistance if overused. Use only when resistance to single products is confirmed by FECRT.

Extended-Release Products (2026)
Eprinomectin ERT (LongRange), Moxidectin

LongRange injectable provides 100–150 days of parasite suppression from a single injection. Very effective for stocker and feedlot management where re-treatment is difficult. The long persistent action increases resistance selection pressure — use strategically, not universally.

7. Anthelmintic Resistance: The 2026 Crisis

Anthelmintic resistance — where parasite populations develop genetic immunity to specific dewormer classes — is now the central challenge in cattle parasite management globally. In 2026, resistance to all three main dewormer classes (benzimidazoles, levamisole, and macrocyclic lactones) has been confirmed in cattle herds across the United States, Australia, Europe, and South America. Cooperia species resistance to ivermectin is now so widespread in North America that some veterinarians describe ivermectin as "ineffective against Cooperia in many regions."

Resistance Warning 2026 Never assume a deworming treatment has worked simply because you gave the injection or applied the pour-on. Resistance development is invisible — cattle receiving a fully resistant product show no observable response to treatment, continue to shed parasite eggs at pre-treatment rates, and contaminate pastures as if no treatment had occurred. The only way to confirm treatment efficacy is a fecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) 14–21 days after treatment. Performing this test once every 3–4 years on your herd is the minimum standard of care in 2026.
  • Behaviors that drive resistance fastest: Treating all animals on a fixed calendar regardless of need; under-dosing (calculating based on underestimated body weight); using the same drug class repeatedly without rotation; treating and moving cattle to clean pasture (removes refugia); using persistent/long-acting products as the sole parasite control method on every animal.
  • Behaviors that slow resistance: Targeted selective treatment (only treat animals that need it); maintaining refugia — leaving 20–30% of the least parasitized animals untreated to dilute resistant genes with susceptible ones; accurate dosing by correct body weight; rotating drug classes based on FECRT data, not on a fixed schedule; using non-chemical management (pasture management, nutrition, genetics) to reduce reliance on treatment.
  • Genetic resistance in cattle: Breeding selection for parasite resistance — selecting replacement animals with consistently lower FEC scores under the same management — is gaining recognition as a sustainable long-term strategy, particularly in breeds like Angus and Red Angus where parasite resistance EPDs are being developed.

8. Strategic Timing and Refugia Management

When you deworm matters as much as how often and with what product. Strategic timing maximizes the biological and economic benefit of each treatment while minimizing resistance selection pressure.

Timing Strategy When to Apply Primary Benefit Resistance Impact
Pre-Calving Treatment (Beef Cows) 4–8 weeks before calving Reduces "periparturient rise" — peak egg shedding that occurs in cows at calving, which contaminates calving pastures Moderate selection pressure — treat with FEC justification
Spring Turnout (Calves and Yearlings) At first spring turnout to pasture Reduces parasite burden carried through winter; limits early-season pasture contamination Moderate — consider leaving some animals untreated for refugia
Mid-Season (August–September) Peak summer/early fall infection risk Targets peak-season larval challenge; prevents autumn inhibited larval buildup in Ostertagia Moderate-High — FEC-guided treatment preferred
Housing or Pre-Winter When cattle come off pasture in fall Eliminates overwintering larvae; particularly targets inhibited Ostertagia larvae Moderate — excellent timing for high-efficacy products
Feedlot Arrival Processing Day 1–3 of feedlot placement Removes incoming parasite burden; protects productive potential during expensive grain-feeding phase Low in context — limited re-infection in confinement; efficacy check 21 days post-treatment
Treat and Move (With Caution) Only if clean pasture is genuinely available Reduces re-infection after treatment on heavily contaminated pastures HIGH risk — moving treated animals to clean pasture eliminates refugia entirely; major resistance driver

9. Parasite Impact and Treatment Benefit Chart

The following chart illustrates the relative production impact of internal parasites across cattle classes and the estimated average daily gain improvement seen in response to effective deworming in research trials.

Estimated Average Daily Gain Improvement from Effective Deworming — Research-Based Averages Across Cattle Classes
Values represent average ADG improvement (lbs/day) from targeted deworming vs untreated control groups under moderate-to-high parasite challenge. Results vary with parasite burden level.
First-Season Grazing Calves
+0.35–0.55 lbs/day ADG improvement
Stocker Calves at Turnout
+0.25–0.45 lbs/day ADG improvement
Yearlings — Heavy Parasite Burden
+0.20–0.35 lbs/day ADG improvement
Replacement Heifers Pre-Breeding
+0.15–0.25 lbs/day; improved pregnancy rates
Mature Beef Cows (Pre-Calving)
+0.10–0.20 lbs/day; improved calf weaning weight
Feedlot Arrivals (Arrival Processing)
+0.15–0.30 lbs/day; improved feed efficiency

10. Application Methods Compared

The same active ingredient can vary significantly in efficacy depending on the delivery method used. Choosing the right application form for your management system is as important as choosing the right product.

Application Method Examples Advantages Limitations Best For
Injectable (SQ or IM) Ivomec Injectable, LongRange, Dectomax Injectable Consistent bioavailability; accurate dosing; SQ preferred per BQA Requires restraint; injection site reactions if IM in hindquarter Feedlot processing; any situation requiring precise dosing
Oral Drench SafeGuard suspension, Panacur paste, Prohibit drench Predictable absorption; no withdrawal in some products; good for benzimidazoles Requires individual restraint and drenching gun; aspiration risk if rushed Benzimidazole administration; calves; accurate dosing essential
Pour-On Ivomec Plus Pour-On, Dectomax Pour-On, Cydectin Pour-On Easy application without restraint chute in some systems; also treats lice and mites Absorption variable — reduced by wet/muddy coat; UV degradation; 20–30% lower bioavailability than injectable macrocyclic lactones Louse and mite control plus internal parasites; lower-priority parasite control events
Feed Additive / Premix SafeGuard medicated feed block, Rumatel (morantel) pellets No individual handling; easy administration in feedlot/confined settings Highly variable intake — dominant animals overconsume; subordinate animals underdose; not reliable for herd-wide treatment Supplemental treatment in confined settings; not recommended as sole treatment method
Long-Acting Injectable (ERT) LongRange (eprinomectin extended-release) Single injection; 100–150 days of persistent protection Expensive; high resistance selection pressure; not appropriate for all situations Stocker operations with high re-infection risk; remote grazing cattle with limited handling access
Pour-On Efficacy Note: Multiple studies have demonstrated that pour-on formulations of macrocyclic lactones (ivermectin, doramectin) achieve 20–35% lower systemic blood levels than equivalent-dose injectable formulations — and in wet or muddy conditions this gap widens further. For a primary deworming event where efficacy matters, an injectable or oral drench formulation provides more reliable and higher bioavailability than a pour-on of the same product. Use pour-ons when the primary target is ectoparasites (lice, mange) with secondary nematode coverage, not as your primary worm treatment tool.

11. Prevention Beyond Deworming

Deworming alone cannot solve a parasite problem on a heavily contaminated farm. Sustainable parasite management integrates chemical treatment with non-chemical strategies that reduce parasite challenge, improve host resistance, and slow resistance development.

  • Pasture Management and Rotation: Most cattle nematode larvae survive less than 3–6 months on pasture under summer conditions and are killed more rapidly by desiccation and UV exposure. Resting pastures for 90+ days before returning cattle reduces infective larval populations substantially. Avoiding continuous stocking of the same pasture by the same class of cattle prevents the level of contamination buildup that overwhelms immune-compromised animals.
  • Avoid Overgrazing — It Concentrates Larval Challenge: Infective larvae are found predominantly in the bottom 2–5 cm of the grass sward — the zone where overgrazing forces cattle to graze. Maintaining adequate pasture cover (above 5 cm residual) reduces the percentage of larvae consumed per bite and significantly decreases parasite uptake rates per animal per day.
  • Mixed Grazing with Non-Susceptible Species: Sheep and cattle share very few parasites — Ostertagia in cattle does not infect sheep and vice versa. Mixed grazing or alternate grazing of cattle and sheep on the same pasture effectively halves the cattle parasite larval population on that pasture, as sheep consume cattle larvae (and die) and cattle consume sheep larvae (and die). This biological dilution is one of the most effective non-chemical parasite control strategies available.
  • Nutrition and Immunity: Well-nourished cattle with adequate protein and mineral status develop stronger acquired immunity to internal parasites than nutrient-deficient animals. Cattle with inadequate copper and zinc status show significantly higher FEC and poorer parasite resilience. Ensuring the ration meets requirements — particularly for protein, copper, zinc, and vitamin A — reduces the parasite burden cattle carry even at the same level of challenge.
  • Genetic Selection: Within breeds, there is meaningful genetic variation in parasite resistance. Animals that consistently show low FEC under the same challenge conditions as herd-mates should be noted and prioritized in breeding decisions. Over time, selecting replacement heifers and bulls from animals with consistently low parasite burdens builds a herd that is naturally more resistant — reducing treatment frequency and treatment costs sustainably.

Frequently Asked Questions

How often should I deworm beef cattle on pasture?
For most temperate-region cow-calf operations, 1–2 strategically timed treatments per year is the current evidence-based recommendation for mature cows, and 2–3 times per year for calves and yearlings in their first and second grazing seasons when parasite challenge is highest. The optimal timing for mature cows is generally pre-calving (4–8 weeks before calving, to reduce the periparturient egg shedding rise) and/or housing in late fall. For calves, spring turnout and mid-to-late summer treatments targeting peak infection risk periods are the standard strategic windows. The key shift from traditional practice is moving away from fixed 4–6 week calendar treatments of all animals regardless of need, toward FEC-guided treatment of animals that actually have a significant parasite burden. This targeted approach produces equal or better parasite control outcomes with fewer treatments and dramatically slower resistance development.
What is the best dewormer for cattle in 2026?
There is no single "best" dewormer for all cattle herds in 2026 — the answer depends on which parasites are present, the resistance status of those parasites to different drug classes in your specific herd, and your delivery method constraints. That said, some general principles apply: moxidectin (Cydectin) remains among the most efficacious macrocyclic lactones because it achieves higher tissue concentrations and has slightly slower resistance development compared to ivermectin. Fenbendazole or oxfendazole (benzimidazoles) are the most appropriate choice for treating inhibited larvae in Type II Ostertagia (a condition uniquely susceptible to this class). For liver fluke in endemic areas, clorsulon (often formulated with ivermectin as Ivomec Plus) is the practical first-choice. The most important single step you can take is to perform a fecal egg count reduction test on your herd — this tells you definitively which products are still working in your specific situation, which is more valuable than any generic recommendation.
Can you over-worm cattle?
Yes — and over-worming is one of the primary causes of the anthelmintic resistance crisis that is threatening effective parasite control globally. Treating cattle more frequently than necessary — or treating all animals regardless of their actual parasite burden — selects strongly for resistance genes in the parasite population. Each unnecessary treatment event removes susceptible parasites and leaves resistant ones to reproduce. Over time, the parasite population on your farm shifts from predominantly susceptible to predominantly resistant, and previously effective dewormers stop working. Beyond resistance, there are also direct considerations: some dewormers (particularly levamisole) have narrow safety margins and overdosing carries toxicity risk. All dewormers have withdrawal periods for milk and meat that must be respected. Treating more often than necessary creates unnecessary drug residue exposure and cost. The appropriate response to parasite concerns is targeted diagnostic-guided treatment — not more frequent blanket treatment.
Do adult cows need deworming as often as calves?
No — adult cows develop substantial acquired immunity to internal parasites through years of natural exposure, and typically require significantly less frequent treatment than calves and yearlings. A healthy mature beef cow with good body condition and adequate nutrition may need only one annual strategic deworming — often pre-calving to reduce periparturient egg shedding — or may not need treatment at all in a given year if FEC testing shows a low parasite burden. Calves in their first grazing season, by contrast, have no acquired immunity and are highly susceptible to significant production loss from moderate parasite burdens — making 2–3 strategically timed treatments per year appropriate for this class. The practical implication is that a blanket whole-herd deworming protocol treats adult cows as if they have the same susceptibility as first-season calves, which wastes product, drives resistance, and is not justified by the science. Age-and-class-specific programs consistently outperform blanket approaches in both efficacy and sustainability.
What are the signs that cattle need deworming?
The most reliable sign that cattle need deworming is a fecal egg count above the treatment threshold — not visible clinical signs. Waiting for obvious clinical symptoms means waiting for a heavy enough parasite burden to cause visible disease, by which time significant production loss has already occurred. Visible signs that indicate a significant parasite problem include bottle jaw (submandibular edema — fluid accumulation under the jaw, indicating severe hypoproteinemia from protein-stealing parasites); pale mucous membranes (anemia from blood-sucking species like Haemonchus); persistent diarrhea without obvious infection; poor growth rates or weight loss in young cattle on adequate nutrition; rough hair coat and dull appearance despite adequate feed intake; and general failure to thrive. In practical terms, if a group of calves or yearlings on good pasture and adequate nutrition is growing 20–30% below expected rates for their age and genetic potential, a high parasite burden should be high on the differential diagnosis list — and FEC testing will confirm or exclude it quickly and cheaply.

Related posts: